In this issue: Re: Astigmatism (long) Re: High Standard Victor trigger Re: Rifle shooting glasses Crosman International Airgun Championship Re: BRNO TAU7 Re: Rifle torque settings How to use polarizers? Eyes and dominant mental entity (long) ******************************************************************** Astigmatism doesn't interfere with target aquisition. You can always adjust your rear sight for correction of position. Astigmatism shifts the whole image of your sight it does not blur it. But if you are wearing prescription glasses you MUST wear your shooting glasses at least half an hour for giving your eye the time to adjust for not using a lens to correct its problem. I am using this for 5 years now after the advice of my doctor and optician (they are shooters too) and after discussing it with the guys at Champion I am convinced that this is the right way. You can use a lens with astigmatism but you must be sure that it will stay ALWAYS at the same position as any change will result to a different sight angle. As you may know most of the shooting glasses are round and they are fixed in one side only so you will always have one more worry if the lens is in front of your eye at the same distance and not shifted in its round frame. If you are going to add an astigmatism lens then ask from your optician to mark the lens and the frame for position reference. [Editor - I asked for a more detailed explanation of his above comments and this is George's reply.] Draw a circle and an eclipse with the same center (to make it easier). Imagine the horizontal diameter of the circle and the horizonal diameter of the eclipse. Imagine now that the longest diameter of the eclipse is NOT vertical or parallel to the horizontal diameter of the circle. The view of your sights will be shifted from the true position. Try now to understand it with the center shifted too. Check the image that I've sent you. You will see that although when your eye is Ok , the sights are over the target when you see an elipse you will aim more below and right. Calculate now the different vertical plane of the rear sight, the plane of the front and the far away plane of the target. You have more than four planes (the first is your eye and lens - two planes but close to each other- ) shifted and distracted. The distraction in astigmatism is not progressional but logarithmic. In theory only when the width of the rear slot (or circle for rifles), the width of the front sight and the projection of the target are the same, your astigmatism is +/-90 degrees, your shooting position is always exactly the same you will NOT have a LARGE distraction. But this is theory and never occurs. The worst thing that can happen for a shooter is to have astigmatism. Of course if you have it then your luck is for +/-90 degrees problem. Short sighting is just blurring in any field and angle of view and you can see through many (well not so many!!) points of the prescription lens (as long as you are trying to see through the center of it). In astigmatism any point other than the exact center of the lens (and sometimes the optician misplace the center or the angle of the lens) you will see a different sight and you will not know it. Add to this the difference between shooting sessions-rounds and you can understand that the minor shiftings add to a major problem. It is like having a rear sight that changes clicks from round to round!!! That is the true reason for not using astigmatism lenses on your shooting glasses. To diminish the whole problem by deleting at least one stage of it. But if you are going to use a correction lens you must add at least a peep sight or an iris for locating the exact center and adjust permanetly the shooting glasses frame, your rear sight and use always the same shooting position. To difficult for most of us. Without the astigmatism lens you have only to deal with the shifting of your sights (corrected with the adjustable sights). As you can imagine this is not true for large amounts of astigmatism. In these cases the use of a lens is a must as the distraction is too much but until now I don't know even one shooter with lots of astigmatism. Most of us have no more than 2 points. And you must know that most eyeglass wearers develop by time slight astigmatism. The main reason is the force on the eye to adjust and dirty glasses (even sunglasses with zero correction)!! This means that although you examined your eyes a month ago your astigmatism may have slight variations. BTW using an iris will broaden your field of depth. This means that (as in photography) you will focus in more planes than with bare eye. The true reason of using adjustable sights is mainly the difference between the roundness of two persons eyes. How many times did you try to shoot a rifle or a pistol of a friend just to find out that you must correct for more than 4-5 clicks left-right or up-down. The gun shoots straight, the roundness of your eyes is different. Of course there are also other reasons for using adjustable sights but this is one of the most important ones. I am sorry that I can not explain it using more scientific language but English is not my native language and I am not an eye doctor. But I have the problem and I love to shoot so I was forced to find out and understand the way of correcting it. I have two good friends and shooters into the science, One is the president of the Greek opticians and the other is an eye doctor (professor in the Greek Med. University). We did a lot of talking about it and I've spent hours talking with the guys of CHAMPION-BRILLEN at Nurnberg this year. I believe that every shooter with astigmatism must understand how to correct its problem. I was shooting 560-565 before understanding my real problem. Now I shoot 570-575 with no astigmatism lens ( and of course corrected sights). This means that 10 nines became 10 tens. I am always here for every question and I love to discuss about our sport. Thank you for providing the shooting community with such an interesting and informative site and mailing list. George Giamarellos Intl. Chief Range Officer for pistol UIT and IPSC shooting Gunsmith for Hammerlis (not by profession) Eyeglass wearer from 12 y/o (now 38)------> 8o) PS. I will be happy if you visit my site "Greek Shooting Pages" http://users.otenet.gr/~g2 It is in Greek and I am sure you will not understand a word (even for us Greeks sometimes it gets too difficult!!) but it is the only Greek site for shooting and my provider gives me only 1Mb of space. Mainly pistol. ****************************************************************** >From your description of the difference I would say the problem is in the trigger bar disconnector point with the sear. As the editor said, it could be dirt in this area. It could be mechanical... Not enough free play when the trigger is held back to reset to the same depth as the first cock. Remove the left grip and work the slide by hand while observing the bar. It should snap up the same distance and hook the sear exactly the same with each cocking of the hammer whether the trigger is depressed or not. A less likely factor (based on your description) is too much clearance in the sear pin to frame hole. A new and/or oversize pin will correct this. Another frequent problem is in the trigger pull adjusting mechanism... Either the screw moves or the spring between the screw and sear is misplaced or loose. I can help you off line after you make these observations. Dave Salyer salyer@126.com ****************************************************************** Re the comments on eye glasses, corrections and things. it is a good response isn't it! The subject seems to have hit a nerve. My thoughts are that the 'old school shooters' insisted to their grave that the foresight has to be in focus. Period. From the time I started shooting I have never shot with the foresight sharp. When I did try it out I just saw an incredibly blurred bull. This old school also insisted that the sight picture can be sharpened by closing the backsight. The pin hole effect. Unfortunately the size of the hole gets too small and it really clouds over and blocks the light - but I concede that the image of the sight and bull is sharper. Shame that it is too dark though. The purpose of the back sight is to enable you to line up the sights with the bull. The pin hole sharpens it up a little bit but there is no way both foresight and target are going to be in focus at the same time. My experience as to the most effective picture is when both target abd foresight are at an equal level of fuzzyness. That is, the eye is focused at some point between the foresight and the target. I suspect that it is around 5 metres or so out. Which brings me to bloop tubes. It was obvious to me when these things arrived the big advantage was that the foresight and target are brought into focus more than with the standard setup. I suspect the the eye is then focused a little more than 5 metres out. (To the human eye 6m appears close to infinity) Thus the longer the better theory. I suspect that the mechanics of "front heavy" rifles brought the extensions to an abrupt end. It seems that about 400mm seems to be about the handiest length to manipulate. Don't forget that people stand and kneel to shoot as well so extra long lengths have a tendency to wave about more in the breeze, thus nullifying the advantages a little bit. Glasses. Big or small. Can you see the flags with a small one? If not then a bigger size wil help. Especially if things are blurry without glasses. Lining a big lens up can be done with a friend. Get them to make sure it is perpendicular and centred over the back sight. What size back sight to use? My rule of thumb is to set it so that there is a clear hole in the middle that just covers the foresight. If the back sight is opened up from about 0.8mm it remains 'hairy' until about 1.0mm. >From then on a clear hole emerges that progressively gives a clean picture through it. It apears that 1.1 to 1.2mm is almost a universal size for backsights. Funny that. Another interesting funny thing to note is that the clear hole that emerges does not always appear in the middle of the backsight. Mine appears a fraction high. Others see it low. It 'could' be an aspect of design of the backsight but I suspect that it is just genetics at work. We are children of the universe and all different. We just relate multiple versions of reality to each other. Vive la difference! Tip for the day - EXPERIMENT! Ross Mason Scientific & Laboratory Instrument Servicing ****************************************************************** I'd like to post an announcement of an Air Rifle/ Air Pistol Open competition in Toronto, Canada next Feb 5/6/7, 1999. It is called the Crosman International Airgun Championship and is ISSF,(UIT) designated as a 'Grand Prix'. There is a double course of fire, i.e. 2x60 or 2x40 as per event. The Championship is shot at a hotel close to the International airport. Room rates are CDN$84, single or double. For information and event information, contact ohahq@netrover.com. Snail @ Ontario Handgun Assoc., 2055 Dundas Street East, Unit 105, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4X 2V9 Last year there were over 280 participants from 5 countries competing. ****************************************************************** I am a long time .45 auto shooter who has recently taken up UIT Airgun. I presently shoot the Tau 7. I just finished the latest mailing list which had answers to the question how many shoots per 12gm CO2 bulb does one get with the Tau 7. The answer depends on the power setting. My pistol, with the velocity set at 445fps, gets about 100 full power shots. When set to 500fps the pistol gets about 40 full power shots. Presently I have my pistol set at 460fps which yields about 65 to 70 full power shots. In a match I start with a full charge, take my warmup shots, shoot 30 shots then dump any remaining CO2 and recharge. This method yields most consistant results. Also, I have designed a pair of little rubber stoppers that allow the Tau 7 to be dry fired. I have attached the instructions for anyone that is interested. <> Lanning R. Hochhauser lanningh@datair.com [Editor - please contact Lanning directly if you wish to see his drawing. I didn't think everyone would like me to send an attachment.] ****************************************************************** Regards: Torque Gentlemen: This is my first time responding to a topic as well. Essentially when tuning a rifle, there seems to be two major trains of thought. One relies on the rifle and the other the ammunition. Handloaders are notorious for spending hours working up loads to make the most accurate ammunition. As the smallbore shooter does not easily have this option, the tuning of the rifle is the key. "Torqueing" or adjusting the tension on the bedding screws affects the harmonics of the barrel, and thus affects the time in which the bullet leaves the barrel. If the period and the vibration are consistant a nice "round" hole is formed. At the University, we have started doing this for not only each rifle but whenever we receive a large change over in the lot of ammunition being shot. We start at a low setting and commence tightening screws alternately and firing groups. Whether in inch pounds or newtons it doesn't matter. But we have been able to get a little more accuracy out of our rifles using this method. And in many cases, the torque settings the rifle(s) are most accurate at do not match front to back. Hope I wasn't too wordy. David Lee NDCS coach / USF rifle coach ****************************************************************** Can you please post a question on the adjustment technique for the rear sight polarisers. I am not sure if it is important to use both polarisers vs. one polariser? Thanks, Eitan Eitan@ytd.com ****************************************************************** THE PHYSICAL EYE AND THE COGNITIVE ENTITY... A visual analyzer consisting of the eyes and visual center of the dominant mental entity are most important to the shooting athlete. The refractive abilities of the eye is altered by the action of the ciliary muscle. This is possible because of the elasticity of the eye's lens. The accommodation reflex allows the eye to focus on objects positioned at varying distances. However, the eye cannot maintain a simultaneous clear image of objects positioned at different distances in space. During the aiming process, under the old military method of shooting, the eye must accommodate three different objects, the target, front sight, and the rear sight. Only one of the three images will be observed and in focus at any one time. The remaining objects will be diffused images on the retina. The eye accommodates rapidly from one point or object to the next, fixing each object clearly in about .0001 to .0004 of a second, in effect one object will be in focus and the other two will appear as hazy or fuzzy images, on the retina at any one time. The dominant mental analyzer must analyze and interpret the three images on the retina simultaneously at the time period indicated above for each image. The analysis function can be accomplished in focus or out of focus. Upon receipt of the images by the visual analysis center of the dominant mental entity, a massive analysis and interpretation phase is accomplished by the dominant mental element of the cognitive entity. Upon the determination by the dominant mental analysis center that the image or information received through the eye is important, such as the image of the bull down range in relation to the front and rear sights is not detected as the perfect bull's-eye, the information is passed to the non-dominant mental entity for interpretation and issuance of instructions to the neuromuscular system for adjustments or physical realignment of muscles necessary to accomplish the corrected bull's-eye alignment. Through mental practice and dryfire training sessions, the shooting athlete will learn to limit the eye or reduce accommodation actions to the front sight only and therewith ignoring the hazy or fuzzy image of the target now held in the mental analysis entity. It is very important that the shooting athlete understand the only image required to be in focus is the front sight as the other images can and will be analyzed as fuzzy objects without focus. Any of the images can be brought into focus by spontaneously placing attention upon the image desired in focus. As the shooting athlete places spontaneous attention upon any one of the images the images becomes focused and clear to the dominant mental entity through the use of ciliary muscle accommodation. The shooting athlete can stop eye fatigue by placing spontaneous attention upon the front sight. The athlete must be very careful not to stare at the front sight as this will cause fixation and bright reflected light will over stimulate the retina, causing visual hallucinations and reduction of the eyes sensitivity. A small movement of the eye from side to side will eliminate this action of the eye. However, this conditioning can breakdown under stress by the shooting athlete. Our natural instinct is to look at the 'bull' we intend to fire upon with our rifle/pistol, not at the rifle/pistol itself or its sights. This natural instinct tends to emerge at the dominant mental level and its effect will be noted after a bad shot has been fired. The physical eye and retina accommodation between the target, front sight, and the rear sight is the major cause of eye fatigue and shooting athlete's failure to obtain consistent shooting results. In bright sun light the bull's-eye on the target appears smaller than in dull light. The reason is that when an area of the retina is strongly stimulated by the bright light, the area of stimulation tends to overflow into the surrounding areas of the retina causing enlargement of the image formed by the bright area of the target. This effect makes the black bull appear smaller. This also affects the point of aim, which is higher in bright light and lower in cloudy conditions or dull light. Fatigue will slow down the eye accommodation reflex, making it very difficult to bring the sights into focus. The best method for relaxing the accommodative system is to relax the ciliary muscles themselves by reducing the necessity of the ciliary muscles to accommodate multi-images during the shooting and sighting process. This reduction in effect is accomplished by only focusing upon the front sight while allowing the rear sight and bull to remain in the background and in unfocused alignment with the front sight. The bull remains a fuzzy image and is aligned through the use of the bright white light in the front sight. Bright reflected light can be controlled through the use of a dark or gray tinted lens. During dull or overcast conditions a yellow or red lens will enhance contrast. The non-dominant mental entity produces the mental pictorial representation of the perfect bull's-eye for use as the point of reference by the non-dominant and neuromuscular system adjustments during the sighting process. The analysis phase compares the physical eye perception of the fuzzy bull in alignment with the front sight while the non-dominant mental entity uses the pictorial representation of the perfect bull's-eye as the index model for the adjustment in relation to the pictorial representation of the physical bull as detected by the physical eye. Upon the determination that the two pictorial representations are identical in every respect the non-dominant mental entity directs the Mental Checklist to continue with the analysis phase and firing process. Extracted from Chapter 8 and Appendix C of the book. Chet Skinner, Coach cskinner@dol.net http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/Midfield/1245 ****************************************************************** End of UIT Mailing List #11 Michael Ray - Systems Engineer Rose-Hulman Inst. of Tech. Rifle Coach UIT Shooting Page - http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/1190/index.htm